Subaru WRX STI Hatchback
Car comparison
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5vsAUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S3 Sportback (8V)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight210 hp/t156 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 63.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 210hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,415mm174in | 4,324mm170in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,785mm70in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,631mm104in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,511mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 340L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,180L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: Power / Torque
- AUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 5,500-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 5.2 s |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 and AUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 210 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 583 km 362 mi |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | 210 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | AUDIS3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 210 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 | AUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Has 27 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI S3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























