Car comparison

Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5vsDodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Subaru WRX STI Hatchback

2.5

300 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2007-2011
VS

Dodge Caliber

SRT4 2.4 16V

295 hp2359 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2008-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    407 Nm
    300 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    583 km
    362 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V

  • Lightest
    1,450 kg
    3,197 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    203 hp/t
    152 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.5 L/100 km
    18.8 mpg US
    22.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
Power
300hp224kW
295hp220kW
Torque
407Nm300lb-ft
363Nm268lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,450kg3,197lb
Gross weight-
2,010kg4,431lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
64.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
75.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.2s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
17.9s
Calculated
24.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.3s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
203hp/t152kW/t92hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
250Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
583km362mi
Calculated
579km360mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,457cc150cu in
2,359cc144cu in
Length
4,415mm174in
4,427mm174in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,785mm70in
Height
1,475mm58in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,530mm60in
1,520mm60in
Rear track
1,540mm61in
1,520mm60in
Trunk volume-
524L
Max trunk volume-
1,360L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
60L
52L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16VPowerTorque
  • Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: Power / Torque
  • Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.56,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V6,000 rpm2,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.2 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.9 s
24.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.3 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
300 hp
224 kW
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
295 hp
220 kW

Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 has 5 hp more than Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
363 Nm
268 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
1,450 kg
3,197 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.55.2 s
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V6.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
199 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
203 hp/t
152 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
583 km
362 mi
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
579 km
360 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
300 hp
224 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
295 hp
220 kW
6.7 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,415 mm
173.8 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
Power
295 hp
220 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
524 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,427 mm
174.3 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
Power
295 hp
220 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
5.2 s
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
199 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
203 hp/t
152 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
295 hp
220 kW
Torque
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.2 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
Fuel consumption
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,415 mm
173.8 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
524 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,427 mm
174.3 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
583 km
362 mi
579 km
360 mi
Trunk score
-
524 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
199 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
203 hp/t
152 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSubaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
Consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.03 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.01 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,704 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 44 Nm more
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V

  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5vsSubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5
SRT4 2.4 16V
2.5
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsSubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5vsSubaruWRX STI2.5
SRT4 2.4 16V
Cupra R 2.0 TFSI
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsSeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009Cupra R 2.0 TFSI
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5vsSubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
SRT4 2.4 16V
R 2.0 TSI
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsVolkswagenGolf VI (3-DOOR)R 2.0 TSI
2.5
SRT4 2.4 16V
VS
SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5vsDodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V
SRT4 2.4 16V
R 2.0 TSI
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsVolkswagenGolf VI (5-DOOR)R 2.0 TSI
SRT4 2.4 16V
2.0 TFSI
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsAUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI
SRT4 2.4 16V
2.0 TFSI
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsAUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI
SRT4 2.4 16V
3.2 V6
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6
SRT4 2.4 16V
3.2 V6
VS
DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16VvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8PA)Facelift 20083.2 V6
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 vs Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster