Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T6vsAUDI S3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight201 hp/t150 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions158 g/km
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T6 | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,045kg4,508lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 45.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 201hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 789km491mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,466mm176in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,631mm104in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,526mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 177g/km | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T6 | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4.7 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has more power, AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T6 | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 789 km 491 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 177 g/km | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T6 | AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Is 435 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























