Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 2.5 T5vsAUDI S3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 2.5 T5
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions185 g/km
- Best estimated range785 km488 mi
- Largest trunk324 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score72/100
AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Most powerful256 hp191 kW
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV402.5 T5 | AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,574kg3,470lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | 723km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,420mm56in | 1,399mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 281L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,011L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | 193g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 5,400 rpm | 1,800-4,200 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV402.5 T5 | AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 256 hp 191 kW |
AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI has 2 hp more than Volvo V40 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 2.5 T5 and AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 1,574 kg 3,470 lb |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 6.1 s |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and Volvo V40 2.5 T5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 785 km 488 mi |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 723 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 256 hp 191 kW | 5.7 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV402.5 T5 | AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,574 kg 3,470 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | 723 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | 193 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 2.5 T5 | AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 2.5 T5
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 62 km (38 mi) more estimated range
- Has 43 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 99 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























