Renault Safrane I (B54)
Car comparison
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)vsAUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S3 (8L)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful263 hp196 kW
- Highest torque363 Nm268 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score75/100
AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range681 km423 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263hp196kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,935kg4,266lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 78.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.2s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 681km423mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,963cc181cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,763mm188in | 4,159mm164in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,763mm69in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,766mm109in | 2,519mm99in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,487mm59in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,020L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 76L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 218g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): Power / Torque
- AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 5,800 rpm | 2,100-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.2 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 263 hp 196 kW |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 210 hp 157 kW |
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) has 53 hp more than AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 53 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 7.2 s |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 6.8 s |
Although Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) has more power, AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 667 km 414 mi |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 681 km 423 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 263 hp 196 kW | 7.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | AUDIS3 (8L)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp 196 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 681 km 423 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 218 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) | AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)
- Has 53 hp more
- Has 93 Nm more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI S3 (8L) 1.8 T
- Is 320 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























