AUDI RSQ3 Sportback
Car comparison
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSIvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
3.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score83/100
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best estimated range788 km490 mi
- Largest trunk755 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 2,028kg4,471lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 19.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 788km490mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,507mm177in | 4,747mm187in |
| Width | 1,851mm73in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,664mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 755L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,804L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,950-5,850 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 19.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 171 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 400 hp 298 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 2,028 kg 4,471 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 4.5 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 708 km 440 mi |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 788 km 490 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 2,028 kg 4,471 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 788 km 490 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 755 L 26.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI
- Is 328 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range
- Has 225 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























