AUDI RSQ3 Sportback
Car comparison
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSIvsAUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI SQ2
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range764 km475 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | AUDISQ22.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 51.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 764km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,507mm177in | 4,210mm166in |
| Width | 1,851mm73in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,495mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,551mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,950-5,850 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | AUDISQ22.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI has 100 hp more than AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI and AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 4.5 s |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI and AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI and AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 708 km 440 mi |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 764 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 764 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI | AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 175 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 41 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























