Car comparison

AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSIvsBMW X7 (G07) M50d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI RSQ3 Sportback

2.5 TFSI

400 hp2480 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-present
VS

BMW X7 (G07)

M50d

400 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    400 hp
    298 kW
  • Lightest
    1,700 kg
    3,748 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    235 hp/t
    175 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

BMW X7 (G07) M50d

  • Highest torque
    760 Nm
    561 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    193 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,081 km
    672 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIBMWX7 (G07)M50d
Power
400hp298kW
400hp298kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
760Nm561lb-ft
Curb weight
1,700kg3,748lb
2,460kg5,423lb
Gross weight
2,250kg4,960lb
3,290kg7,253lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
85.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
15.0s
Calculated
21.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
708km440mi
Calculated
1,081km672mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,480cc151cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,507mm177in
5,151mm203in
Width
1,851mm73in
2,000mm79in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,805mm71in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
3,105mm122in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,682mm66in
Rear track
1,583mm62in
1,703mm67in
Ground clearance-
221mm9in
Trunk volume
530L
326L
Max trunk volume
1,400L
2,120L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
63L
80L
CO2 emissions
204g/km
193g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSIBMW X7 (G07) M50dPowerTorque
  • AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • BMW X7 (G07) M50d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI5,850-7,000 rpm1,950-5,850 rpm7,250 rpm
BMWX7 (G07)M50d4,400 rpm2,000-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIBMWX7 (G07)M50d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
21.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
400 hp
298 kW
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
400 hp
298 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
760 Nm
561 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
2,460 kg
5,423 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI4.5 s
BMWX7 (G07)M50d5.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI and BMW X7 (G07) M50d: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50d and AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
708 km
440 mi
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
1,081 km
672 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
400 hp
298 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
400 hp
298 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,507 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
5,151 mm
202.8 in
Height
1,805 mm
71.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

BMW X7 (G07) M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
4.5 s
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BMWX7 (G07)M50d
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIBMWX7 (G07)M50d
Power
400 hp
298 kW
400 hp
298 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
760 Nm
561 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
2,460 kg
5,423 lb
Fuel consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,507 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
5,151 mm
202.8 in
Height
1,805 mm
71.1 in
Range score
708 km
440 mi
1,081 km
672 mi
CO2 score
204 g/km
193 g/km
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSIBMW X7 (G07) M50d
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI

  • Is 760 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 73 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 204 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW X7 (G07) M50d

  • Has 280 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 373 km (232 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 11 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI
BMW X7 (G07) M50d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIvsAUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI
M50d
40i
VS
BMWX7 (G07)M50dvsBMWX7 (G07)Facelift 202240i
2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI performance
VS
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIvsAUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance
M50d
M50d
VS
BMWX7 (G07)M50dvsBMWX6 (F16)M50d
2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIvsAUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI
M50d
M50d
VS
BMWX7 (G07)M50dvsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d
2.5 TFSI
55 95 kWh
VS
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIvsAUDIe-tron55 95 kWh
M50d
3.0i
VS
BMWX7 (G07)M50dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i
2.5 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIvsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
M50d
50i
VS
BMWX7 (G07)M50dvsBMWX6 (E71)50i
2.5 TFSI
55 114 kWh
VS
AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 e-tron55 114 kWh
M50d
35d
VS
BMWX7 (G07)M50dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI vs BMW X7 (G07) M50d - car comparison - FastVsFaster