AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10vsFerrari California 30 4.3 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California
30 4.3 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions299 g/km
- Best estimated range595 km370 mi
- Largest trunk340 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score49/100
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10
- Fastest top speed313 km/h194 mph
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight305 hp/t228 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 490hp365kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 505Nm372lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | - |
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.8s99% target: 310 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 59.7s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 305hp/t228kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 537km334mi Calculated | 595km370mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 4,297cc262cu in |
| Length | 4,440mm175in | 4,562mm180in |
| Width | 1,929mm76in | 1,909mm75in |
| Height | 1,244mm49in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 100L | 340L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 349g/km | 299g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 7,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW |
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 has 35 hp more than Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 4.1 s |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 3.8 s |
Although AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 has more power, Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 305 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 537 km 334 mi |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 595 km 370 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW | 4.1 s | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW | 3.8 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 305 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 490 hp 365 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 537 km 334 mi | 595 km 370 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 349 g/km | 299 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 305 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 | Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 59 km (36 mi) more estimated range
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
- Emits 50 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























