Car comparison

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10vsBentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012

5.2 FSI V10

525 hp5204 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2012-2015
VS

Bentley Continental GT II

V8 S 4.0

521 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2014-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0

  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.4 L/100 km
    15.3 mpg US
    18.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    246 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    857 km
    533 mi
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
Power
525hp391kW
521hp389kW
Torque
530Nm391lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
2,295kg5,060lb
Gross weight
2,020kg4,453lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
313 km/h
194 mph
309 km/h
192 mph
To 99% top speed
65.8s99% target: 310 km/h / 193 mph
Calculated
83.7s99% target: 306 km/h / 190 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
12.2s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
305hp/t228kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton
Calculated
296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
537km334mi
Calculated
857km533mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,204cc318cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
4,440mm175in
4,806mm189in
Width
1,929mm76in
1,944mm77in
Height
1,244mm49in
1,404mm55in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,746mm108in
Front track
1,638mm64in
1,664mm66in
Rear track
1,595mm63in
1,655mm65in
Trunk volume
100L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
80L
90L
CO2 emissions
349g/km
246g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V108,000 rpm6,500 rpm8,250 rpm
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.2 s
14.4 s
Top speed
313 km/h
194 mph
309 km/h
192 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
198 km/h
123 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
525 hp
391 kW
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
521 hp
389 kW

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 has 4 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
2,295 kg
5,060 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
313 km/h
194 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
309 km/h
192 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V104.1 s
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.04.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 and Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
305 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
537 km
334 mi
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
857 km
533 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
525 hp
391 kW
4.1 s
313 km/h
194 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
521 hp
389 kW
4.5 s
309 km/h
192 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
313 km/h
194 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,440 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,244 mm
49.0 in
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
Power
521 hp
389 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
309 km/h
192 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
313 km/h
194 mph
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
Power
521 hp
389 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
309 km/h
192 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
4.1 s
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
305 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
Power
525 hp
391 kW
521 hp
389 kW
Torque
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
4.5 s
Top speed
313 km/h
194 mph
309 km/h
192 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
Fuel consumption
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,440 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,244 mm
49.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Range score
537 km
334 mi
857 km
533 mi
CO2 score
349 g/km
246 g/km
Trunk score
100 L
3.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
305 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
Consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km26.08 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.96 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,911 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI R8 Spyder (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 575 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 78 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 320 km (199 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 103 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
V8 S 4.0
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
V8 S 4.0
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8
5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10
V8 S 4.0
6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
5.2 FSI V10
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)Facelift 20124.2 FSI V8
V8 S 4.0
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0
5.2 FSI V10
6.0 V12
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12
V8 S 4.0
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
5.2 FSI V10
6.0
VS
AUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10vsAston MartinV12 Vantage6.0
V8 S 4.0
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 vs Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster