Ferrari F430 Spider
Car comparison
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32VvsAUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI R8 Spyder (42)
5.2 FSI V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight322 hp/t240 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score33/100
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption22.2 L/100 km10.6 mpg US12.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 490hp365kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.6s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 64.5s99% target: 310 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.9L/100 km8.7mpg US10.5mpg UK | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 322hp/t240kW/t146hp/1000 lb Calculated | 305hp/t228kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 537km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,308cc263cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,512mm178in | 4,434mm175in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,234mm49in | 1,244mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,616mm64in | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 100L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 349g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 8,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 12.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 490 hp 365 kW |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW |
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10 has 35 hp more than Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V and AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 313 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 4.1 s |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 4.1 s |
Although AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10 has more power, Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 322 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 305 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 490 hp 365 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW | 4.1 s | 313 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | AUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 490 hp 365 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 313 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 537 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 349 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 322 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 305 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI R8 Spyder (42) 5.2 FSI V10
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























