AUDI RSQ3 Sportback
Car comparison
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSIvsAUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q8 (4M)
55 TFSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions204 g/km
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score83/100
AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range934 km580 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,820kg6,217lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 934km580mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,507mm177in | 4,986mm196in |
| Width | 1,851mm73in | 1,995mm79in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,705mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,679mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,691mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 605L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,755L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | 207g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,950-5,850 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 5,000-6,400 rpm | 1,370-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI has 60 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 and AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 4.5 s |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI and AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 708 km 440 mi |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 934 km 580 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRSQ3 Sportback2.5 TFSI | AUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 934 km 580 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | 207 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI | AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RSQ3 Sportback 2.5 TFSI
- Has 60 hp more
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q8 (4M) 55 TFSI V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 226 km (141 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























