AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) · Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6vsBuick Envision II Plus 652T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBuick Envision II
Plus 652T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range955 km593 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 237hp177kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | - |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 94.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 87.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.6s Calculated | 40.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 955km593mi Calculated | 919km571mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,992mm197in | 4,845mm191in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,883mm74in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,695mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 515L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,712L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Buick Envision II Plus 652T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.6 s | 40.7 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW |
Buick Envision II Plus 652T has 6 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 7.1 s |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 8.1 s |
Although Buick Envision II Plus 652T has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 955 km 593 mi |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 919 km 571 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6 | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 237 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 955 km 593 mi | 919 km 571 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6 | Buick Envision II Plus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) Facelift 2023 45 TDI V6
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 355 kg lighter
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























