AUDI Q6
Car comparison
AUDI Q6 40 TFSIvsCadillac GT4 25T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac GT4
25T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted207 km/h129 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk289 L
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ640 TFSI | CadillacGT425T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,765kg6,096lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 80.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.8s Calculated | 63.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 757km470mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 5,099mm201in | 4,633mm182in |
| Width | 2,014mm79in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,784mm70in | 1,536mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,704mm67in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,721mm68in | 1,619mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 131mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | 289L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,398L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ640 TFSI | CadillacGT425T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.8 s | 63.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW |
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI has 20 hp more than Cadillac GT4 25T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| CadillacGT425T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
| CadillacGT425T | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| CadillacGT425T | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 8.6 s |
| CadillacGT425T | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q6 40 TFSI and Cadillac GT4 25T: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 757 km 470 mi |
| CadillacGT425T | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacGT425T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacGT425T |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ640 TFSI | CadillacGT425T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 757 km 470 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q6 40 TFSI | Cadillac GT4 25T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.19 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.05 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,388 L367 US gal305 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,428 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Is 545 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 126 km (78 mi) more estimated range
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























