AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsSkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq II
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range855 km531 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,937kg4,270lb |
| Gross weight | 2,535kg5,589lb | 2,502kg5,516lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.3s Calculated | 37.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 855km531mi Calculated | 725km450mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,758mm187in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,656mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 187mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 340L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 2,035L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.3 s | 37.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 1,937 kg 4,270 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 855 km 531 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 725 km 450 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,937 kg 4,270 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 855 km 531 mi | 725 km 450 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 42 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Has 180 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























