Car comparison

Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0vsSkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (U25)

S 2.0

204 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Skoda Kodiaq II

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    783 km
    486 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
Power
204hp152kW
204hp152kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,937kg4,270lb
Gross weight
2,195kg4,839lb
2,502kg5,516lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
84.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
37.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
783km486mi
Calculated
725km450mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,444mm175in
4,758mm187in
Width
1,843mm73in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,661mm65in
1,656mm65in
Wheelbase
2,692mm106in
2,791mm110in
Front track-
1,586mm62in
Rear track-
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance-
187mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
340L
Max trunk volume
1,450L
2,035L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
54L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.05,000-6,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
37.3 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
1,937 kg
4,270 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
228 km/h
142 mph
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.07.1 s
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI7.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
105 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
783 km
486 mi
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
725 km
450 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
228 km/h
142 mph
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.5 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
340 L
12.0 cu ft
Length
4,758 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,656 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
105 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,937 kg
4,270 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
340 L
12.0 cu ft
Length
4,758 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,656 mm
65.2 in
Range score
783 km
486 mi
725 km
450 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
340 L
12.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
105 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (U25) S 2.0Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0

  • Is 297 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 110 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
S 2.0
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014JCW 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
GLB 220d
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d
2.0 TSI
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TFSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 vs Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster