AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,121 km696 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions130 g/km
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 79.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 38.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,121km696mi Calculated | 1,041km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 38.8 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,121 km 696 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,041 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,121 km 696 mi | 1,041 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 km (50 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























