AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 250e
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 250e
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight94 hp/t70 kW/t10.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.4 L/100 km168.0 mpg US201.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,500 km1,553 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score100/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 81.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.9s Calculated | 49.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 1.4L/100 km168mpg US201.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,354km841mi Calculated | 2,500km1,553mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,637mm64in | 1,609mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,611mm63in | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 385L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 1,385L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 35L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.9 s | 49.9 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 163 hp 122 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,354 km 841 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 2,500 km 1,553 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.0 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
| 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,354 km 841 mi | 2,500 km 1,553 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 1.4 L/100 km168 mpg US201.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 2.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 3.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 210 L55 US gal46 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 367.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1,146 km (712 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























