AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,354 km841 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.9s Calculated | 54.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,354km841mi Calculated | 589km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,637mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,611mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 43L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.9 s | 54.4 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,354 km 841 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 589 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.0 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,354 km 841 mi | 589 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 765 km (475 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























