Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSIvsMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

2.0 TFSI

252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Mini Countryman (F60)

JCW 2.0

231 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    252 hp
    188 kW
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    972 km
    604 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Lightest
    1,555 kg
    3,428 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
252hp188kW
231hp172kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,555kg3,428lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
71.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
72.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
25.4s
Calculated
26.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
972km604mi
Calculated
739km459mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,299mm169in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,822mm72in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,567mm62in
Trunk volume
550L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
1,390L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
51L
CO2 emissions
164g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSIMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,450-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.4 s
26.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
252 hp
188 kW
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI has 21 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
1,555 kg
3,428 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
237 km/h
147 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI6.3 s
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.06.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
972 km
604 mi
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
739 km
459 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
252 hp
188 kW
6.3 s
237 km/h
147 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
6.5 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.3 s
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.5 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
972 km
604 mi
739 km
459 mi
CO2 score
164 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSIMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Is 165 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
JCW 2.0
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014JCW 1.6
2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
JCW 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
JCW 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
JCW 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
JCW 2.0
25d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
JCW 2.0
25i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)25i
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI vs Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster