AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsPorsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B)
S 3.0 Diesel V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 89.0s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.5s Calculated | 44.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,681mm184in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,651mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 2,750-4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.5 s | 44.3 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 has 21 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI | Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 298 km (185 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























