Car comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6vsSubaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R)

3.2 FSI V6

270 hp3197 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2008-2012
VS

Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010

2.5 Turbo

262 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    270 hp
    201 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    806 km
    501 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
270hp201kW
262hp195kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
347Nm256lb-ft
Curb weight
1,805kg3,979lb
1,585kg3,494lb
Gross weight
2,415kg5,324lb
-
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
80.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
70.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
29.3s
Calculated
28.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
806km501mi
Calculated
571km355mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,197cc195cu in
2,457cc150cu in
Length
4,629mm182in
4,560mm180in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,653mm65in
1,700mm67in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,615mm103in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
225mm9in
Trunk volume
540L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,560L
1,610L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
60L
CO2 emissions-
248g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 TurboPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
  • Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V66,500 rpm3,000 rpm6,750 rpm
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo6,000 rpm2,800-4,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.3 s
28.6 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
270 hp
201 kW
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
262 hp
195 kW

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 has 8 hp more than Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
347 Nm
256 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
1,585 kg
3,494 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
234 km/h
145 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 has more power, Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
806 km
501 mi
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
571 km
355 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
270 hp
201 kW
6.9 s
234 km/h
145 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
262 hp
195 kW
6.5 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
262 hp
195 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
262 hp
195 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
6.9 s
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
270 hp
201 kW
262 hp
195 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
347 Nm
256 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Range score
806 km
501 mi
571 km
355 mi
CO2 score
-
248 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 235 km (146 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Is 220 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
Subaru Forester III 2.5 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 vs Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster