AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6vsSubaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru Forester III · Facelift 2010
2.5 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Highest torque347 Nm256 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 270hp201kW | 262hp195kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 347Nm256lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | - |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 70.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 571km355mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,197cc195cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,700mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,615mm103in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,530mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 225mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,610L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 248g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 2,800-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 262 hp 195 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 has 8 hp more than Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 6.5 s |
Although AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 has more power, Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 806 km 501 mi |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 571 km 355 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 262 hp 195 kW | 6.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270 hp 201 kW | 262 hp 195 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 571 km 355 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 248 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 | Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 235 km (146 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
- Has 17 Nm more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























