Car comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6vsSubaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R)

3.0 TDI V6

240 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2008-2012
VS

Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010

2.5 Turbo

230 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
240hp179kW
230hp172kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,865kg4,112lb
1,545kg3,406lb
Gross weight
2,445kg5,390lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
74.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
31.1s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
571km355mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
2,457cc150cu in
Length
4,629mm182in
4,560mm180in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,653mm65in
1,700mm67in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,615mm103in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
225mm9in
Trunk volume
540L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,560L
1,660L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
60L
CO2 emissions-
248g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 TurboPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6: Power / Torque
  • Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V64,000-4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo5,200 rpm2,800 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.1 s
35.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
240 hp
179 kW
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
230 hp
172 kW

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 has 10 hp more than Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
1,865 kg
4,112 lb
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
1,545 kg
3,406 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
225 km/h
140 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V66.5 s
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
1,000 km
621 mi
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
571 km
355 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
225 km/h
140 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
230 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.5 s
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,865 kg
4,112 lb
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
571 km
355 mi
CO2 score
-
248 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 429 km (266 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

  • Is 320 kg lighter
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6
Subaru Forester III 2.5 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 TDI V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6
2.5 Turbo
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester IV2.0
3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.5 Turbo
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.5 Turbo
Sport 2.0 T
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
3.0 TDI V6
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.5 Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6vsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
2.5 Turbo
GLK 350 CDI V6
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6vsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.5 Turbo
28i
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsBMWX1 (E84)28i
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 vs Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster