AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6vsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,119 km696 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score89/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid
- Lightest1,910 kg4,211 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 1,910kg4,211lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | 2,490kg5,490lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.0s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.1s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km696mi Calculated | 1,043km648mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 176g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 3,250-4,750 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.1 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 211 hp 157 kW |
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 has 20 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid and AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 7.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 1,119 km 696 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 1,043 km 648 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 696 mi | 1,043 km 648 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 176 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























