BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 25dvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)25d | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 82.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 25d: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)25d | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 25d has 1 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (F48) 25d: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 6.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 981 km 609 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.9 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)25d | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 25d | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 25d
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























