AUDI Q3 I (8U)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions174 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 82.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.4s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km516mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,800-4,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.4 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI has 19 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
Although AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI has more power, AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 831 km 516 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.9 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 516 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 169 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























