AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,595kg5,721lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 82.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 985km612mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,621mm64in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI has 26 hp more than AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 985 km 612 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.9 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 985 km 612 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 26 hp more
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























