Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0vsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 II (F3)
45 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions158 g/km
- Best economy score88/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Best estimated range789 km491 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 71.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,484mm177in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,856mm73in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,567mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 5,000-6,700 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 has 1 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 6.3 s |
Although Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 739 km 459 mi |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























