Car comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsBMW X1 (F48) 20d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

40 TFSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    126 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,063 km
    660 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIBMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
1,615kg3,560lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
79.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
78.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
37.1s
Calculated
38.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
800km497mi
Calculated
1,063km660mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,484mm177in
4,439mm175in
Width
1,856mm73in
1,821mm72in
Height
1,616mm64in
1,598mm63in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,561mm61in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,562mm61in
Ground clearance-
183mm7in
Trunk volume
530L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
51L
CO2 emissions
170g/km
126g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIBMW X1 (F48) 20dPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIBMWX1 (F48)20d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.1 s
38.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
190 hp
142 kW
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,615 kg
3,560 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
220 km/h
137 mph
BMWX1 (F48)20d
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI7.4 s
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
800 km
497 mi
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,063 km
660 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
220 km/h
137 mph
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.4 s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIBMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Range score
800 km
497 mi
1,063 km
660 mi
CO2 score
170 g/km
126 g/km
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI

  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 263 km (163 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 44 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI vs BMW X1 (F48) 20d - car comparison - FastVsFaster