AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions126 g/km
- Best estimated range1,563 km971 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 95.3s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.1s Calculated | 55.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 800km497mi Calculated | 1,563km971mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,856mm73in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.1 s | 55.6 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 1,563 km 971 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 800 km 497 mi | 1,563 km 971 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 763 km (474 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























