BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 20ivsAUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best estimated range887 km551 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score88/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 85.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 48.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 887km551mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,477mm176in | 4,385mm173in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-4,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 48.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i has 14 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i and AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 887 km 551 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 887 km 551 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i | AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























