AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,767kg3,896lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 97.4s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.2s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,164km723mi Calculated | 1,154km717mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,388mm173in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,365L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.2 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,767 kg 3,896 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,164 km 723 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,154 km 717 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.7 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,767 kg 3,896 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,164 km 723 mi | 1,154 km 717 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 142 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 190 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























