AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 84.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 40.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,121km696mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,388mm173in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,365L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 40.2 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI has 6 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,121 km 696 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,121 km 696 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























