AUDI Q2
Car comparison
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions146 g/km
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score90/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 82.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 859km534mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,191mm165in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,794mm71in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,508mm59in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,000L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 146g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,150 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI has 40 hp more than AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
Although AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI has more power, AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 859 km 534 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.9 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ22.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 859 km 534 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 146 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q2 2.0 TFSI
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 141 km (87 mi) more estimated range
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























