AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDIvsAUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q2
1.4 TFSI COD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,354 km841 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.8s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 80.4s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.9s Calculated | 47.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,354km841mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,637mm64in | 1,508mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,611mm63in | 1,541mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 1,050L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 125g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.9 s | 47.0 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI has 13 hp more than AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 9.0 s |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 8.5 s |
Although AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI has more power, AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI and AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,354 km 841 mi |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.0 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,354 km 841 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 125 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI | AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 445 km (277 mi) more estimated range
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
- Is 460 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























