AUDI Q2
Car comparison
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI CODvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,563 km971 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions125 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.4s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 95.1s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.0s Calculated | 55.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 1,563km971mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,395cc85cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,191mm165in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,794mm71in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,508mm59in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,601mm102in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,050L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.0 s | 55.5 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI has 40 hp more than AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 8.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
Although AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI has more power, AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 909 km 565 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 1,563 km 971 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 1,563 km 971 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 653 km (406 mi) more estimated range
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























