AUDI A8L (D4/4H) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) · Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6vsCadillac CTS III 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS III
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Lightest1,651 kg3,640 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 262hp195kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,651kg3,640lb |
| Gross weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.7s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,390km864mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,265mm207in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 1,949mm77in | 1,833mm72in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,122mm123in | 2,910mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 388L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | 4,000-4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 6,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.7 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | 262 hp 195 kW |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Cadillac CTS III 2.0 has 10 hp more than AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | 6.1 s |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 6.8 s |
Although Cadillac CTS III 2.0 has more power, AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | 262 hp 195 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TDI V6 | CadillacCTS III2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 262 hp 195 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,390 km 864 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 3.0 TDI V6
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 132 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 284 kg lighter
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























