Volkswagen Phaeton
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48VvsAUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A8L (D3/4E)
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.5 L/100 km11.5 mpg US13.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range652 km405 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score70/100
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,300kg5,071lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Gross weight | 2,850kg6,283lb | 2,545kg5,611lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 49.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.9L/100 km9.8mpg US11.8mpg UK | 20.5L/100 km11.5mpg US13.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 577km358mi Calculated | 652km405mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 5,055mm199in | 5,181mm204in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,881mm113in | 3,074mm121in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,629mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,612mm63in | 1,615mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: Power / Torque
- AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 6,500 rpm | 4,000-4,700 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.0 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 186 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 420 hp 313 kW |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW |
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V and AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 6.1 s |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 and Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 and Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 577 km 358 mi |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 652 km 405 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 420 hp 313 kW | 6.1 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V |
| 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 577 km 358 mi | 652 km 405 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V | AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.30 LC100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.94 LC100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,095 LC/year | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phaeton 6.0 W12 48V
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 km (47 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























