AUDI A8L (D3/4E)
Car comparison
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12vsJaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X350)
4.2 V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.6 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km429 mi
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 541Nm399lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 2,545kg5,611lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.1s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.5L/100 km11.5mpg US13.8mpg UK | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 652km405mi Calculated | 691km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 5,181mm204in | 5,090mm200in |
| Width | 1,894mm75in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,448mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,074mm121in | 3,034mm119in |
| Front track | 1,629mm64in | 1,556mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 470L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 6,500 rpm | 4,000-4,700 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW |
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 has 50 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 652 km 405 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 691 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)6.0 W12 | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 652 km 405 mi | 691 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12 | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) 6.0 W12
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 39 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























