AUDI A8L (D3/4E) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) · Facelift 2005 6.0 W12vsCadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS I
V 6.0 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score70/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Lightest1,780 kg3,924 lb
- Best power-to-weight228 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 536Nm395lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Gross weight | 2,545kg5,611lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 51.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.2s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.1L/100 km11.7mpg US14.1mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 662km411mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,967cc364cu in |
| Length | 5,192mm204in | 4,864mm191in |
| Width | 1,894mm75in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,074mm121in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,619mm64in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 362L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | 6,200 rpm | 4,000-4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 189 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12 has 45 hp more than Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | 5.2 s |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 4.6 s |
Although AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12 has more power, Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20056.0 W12 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.6 L/100 km 17.3 mpg US 20.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 662 km 411 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 362 L 12.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.30 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,040 L539 US gal449 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,570 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 6.0 W12
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 44 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 138 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























