Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsAUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X

2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

359 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014
VS

AUDI A8 (D4/4H)

4.2 BiTDI V8

350 hp4134 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8

  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    195 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,216 km
    756 mi
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    359 hp
    268 kW
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    172 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
Power
359hp268kW
350hp261kW
Torque
363Nm268lb-ft
800Nm590lb-ft
Curb weight
1,560kg3,439lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,660kg5,864lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
58.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
12.0s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
387km241mi
Calculated
1,216km756mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
4,134cc252cu in
Length
4,505mm177in
5,137mm202in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,949mm77in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,992mm118in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,545mm61in
1,635mm64in
Ground clearance
135mm5in
120mm5in
Trunk volume-
510L
Max trunk volume-
1,142L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
90L
CO2 emissions
328g/km
195g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-3606,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V84,000 rpm1,750-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.0 s
17.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
13.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
200 km/h
124 mph
179 km/h
111 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
350 hp
261 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 has 9 hp more than AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
1,995 kg
4,398 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-3604.1 s
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 6.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
387 km
241 mi
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
1,216 km
756 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
350 hp
261 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
5,137 mm
202.2 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
4.1 s
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8
Power
359 hp
268 kW
350 hp
261 kW
Torque
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
5,137 mm
202.2 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
387 km
241 mi
1,216 km
756 mi
CO2 score
328 g/km
195 g/km
Trunk score
-
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Is 435 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8

  • Has 437 Nm more
  • Uses 6.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 829 km (515 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 133 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
4.2 BiTDI V8
4.2 TDI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 TDI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
4.2 BiTDI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8vsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)Facelift 20074.2 FSI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
4.2 BiTDI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8vsAUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20074.2 FSI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
4.2 BiTDI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8vsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
4.2 FSI V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
4.2 BiTDI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8vsAUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8
4.2 BiTDI V8
4.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
VS
AUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 BiTDI V8vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20134.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
5.0 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 vs AUDI A8 (D4/4H) 4.2 BiTDI V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster