Car comparison

MG ZT 4.6 V8vsAUDI A8 (D2/4D) · Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

MG ZT

4.6 V8

260 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2003-2005
VS

AUDI A8 (D2/4D) · Facelift 1998

3.7 V8 40V

260 hp3697 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2002-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V

  • Lightest
    1,645 kg
    3,627 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.9 L/100 km
    13.9 mpg US
    16.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    783 km
    486 mi
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

MG ZT 4.6 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    410 Nm
    302 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMGZT4.6 V8AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
Power
260hp194kW
260hp194kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,645kg3,627lb
Gross weight-
2,245kg4,949lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
85.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
20.4s
Calculated
25.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
492km306mi
Calculated
783km486mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
3,697cc226cu in
Length
4,740mm187in
5,034mm198in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,438mm57in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,882mm113in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,593mm63in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,584mm62in
Trunk volume
432L
525L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
90L
CO2 emissions
314g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

MG ZT 4.6 V8AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40VPowerTorque
  • MG ZT 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MGZT4.6 V85,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V6,000 rpm3,250 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMGZT4.6 V8AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.4 s
25.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
169 km/h
105 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
260 hp
194 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
1,645 kg
3,627 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V86.5 s
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT 4.6 V8 and AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V and MG ZT 4.6 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
492 km
306 mi
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
783 km
486 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MGZT4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
260 hp
194 kW
8.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MGZT4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,740 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,034 mm
198.2 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MGZT4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

MG ZT 4.6 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MGZT4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.5 s
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MGZT4.6 V8
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMGZT4.6 V8AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40V
Power
260 hp
194 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,740 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,034 mm
198.2 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Range score
492 km
306 mi
783 km
486 mi
CO2 score
314 g/km
-
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMG ZT 4.6 V8AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

MG ZT 4.6 V8

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V

  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 290 km (180 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 93 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
MG ZT 4.6 V8
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) 3.7 V8 40V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 V8
2.0
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
3.7 V8 40V
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40VvsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)4.2 V8 40V
4.6 V8
430 V8
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
3.7 V8 40V
4.2 V8 32V
VS
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40VvsAUDIA8 (D2/4D)4.2 V8 32V
4.6 V8
2.9 T6 24V
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
3.7 V8 40V
4.2 BiTDI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40VvsAUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8
4.6 V8
330i
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsBMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i
3.7 V8 40V
4.2 BiTDI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40VvsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8
4.6 V8
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
3.7 V8 40V
4.2 BiTDI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40VvsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)Facelift 20074.2 BiTDI V8
4.6 V8
2.7 V6
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
3.7 V8 40V
4.2 BiTDI V8
VS
AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19983.7 V8 40VvsAUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20074.2 BiTDI V8
MG ZT 4.6 V8 vs AUDI A8 (D2/4D) · Facelift 1998 3.7 V8 40V - car comparison - FastVsFaster