AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) · Facelift 2023 40 TDIvsKia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKia Stinger
2.2 CRDi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Largest trunk535 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
- Highest torque441 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,703 kg3,754 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 441Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,703kg3,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,435kg5,368lb | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 132.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 130.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.6s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,199cc134cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,830mm190in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,926mm115in | 2,905mm114in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,619mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 406L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,114L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 147g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 3,800 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.6 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI has 4 hp more than Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi.
The biggest power difference is between Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 7.6 s |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 147 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 406 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI | Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) Facelift 2023 40 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 129 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
- Has 41 Nm more
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























