Kia Stinger
Car comparison
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDivsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,649 kg3,635 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Largest trunk1,557 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque441 Nm325 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 441Nm325lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,703kg3,754lb | 1,649kg3,635lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 130.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 117.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.1s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,294km804mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,199cc134cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,830mm190in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,905mm114in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,596mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | 406L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,114L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 147g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 3,800 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.1 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,294 km 804 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 147 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 406 L 14.3 cu ft | 1,557 L 55.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
- Has 41 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Is 54 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 223 km (138 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1,151 L more trunk volume
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























