AUDI A7 Sportback (C8)
Car comparison
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Lightest1,576 kg3,474 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,576kg3,474lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 144.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 133.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.9s Calculated | 39.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,286km799mi Calculated | 1,404km873mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,926mm115in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 563L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | 122g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 3,750-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.9 s | 39.6 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI has 14 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
Although AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI has more power, Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 1,286 km 799 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,286 km 799 mi | 1,404 km 873 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | 122 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Is 124 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























