Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 EvovsAUDI A6 Sedan (C8) · Facelift 2023 45 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 Sedan (C8) · Facelift 2023
45 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score86/100
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) Facelift 2023 45 TFSI
- Best estimated range768 km477 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,340kg5,159lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 18.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 768km477mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,677mm184in | 4,939mm194in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,886mm74in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,924mm115in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 995L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) Facelift 2023 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 18.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5.7 s |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo and AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) Facelift 2023 45 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 649 km 403 mi |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 768 km 477 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 768 km 477 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) Facelift 2023 45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) Facelift 2023 45 TFSI
- Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Has 116 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























