Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300dvsLynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range943 km586 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 56.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 943km586mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,992cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,677mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,587mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,200 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 5.7 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d and Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 943 km 586 mi |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 649 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d | Lynk & Co03+ Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 943 km 586 mi | 649 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d | Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 294 km (183 mi) more estimated range
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 03 + Cyan 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























