AUDI A6 Avant (C8)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,370 km851 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk716 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,856kg4,092lb |
| Gross weight | 2,425kg5,346lb | - |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.0s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,370km851mi Calculated | 1,065km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,939mm194in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,886mm74in | - |
| Height | 1,467mm58in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,924mm115in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 716L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,695L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 3,750-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 1,370 km 851 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,065 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,370 km 851 mi | 1,065 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 716 L 25.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDI | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 Avant (C8) 40 TDI
- Is 86 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 305 km (190 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 151 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























