AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 3.0 TDIvsVolvo V90 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,587 km986 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,996kg4,400lb |
| Gross weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | - |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 75.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,587km986mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,943mm195in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,874mm74in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,912mm115in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,627mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,680L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 4,000-5,000 rpm | 1,250-3,750 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 218 hp 163 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 D5 has 17 hp more than AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 D5: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 7.3 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D5 and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 D5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 1,587 km 986 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,587 km 986 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI | Volvo V90 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 3.0 TDI
- Is 236 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 516 km (320 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























