Car comparison

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2016-2018
VS

Skoda Octavia III Scout

2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,484 kg
    3,272 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDISkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190hp142kW
184hp137kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,810kg3,990lb
1,484kg3,272lb
Gross weight
2,440kg5,379lb
2,129kg4,694lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
77.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
36.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,404km872mi
Calculated
1,078km670mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,943mm195in
4,685mm184in
Width
1,874mm74in
1,814mm71in
Height
1,461mm58in
1,531mm60in
Wheelbase
2,912mm115in
2,679mm105in
Front track
1,627mm64in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,618mm64in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance-
171mm7in
Trunk volume
565L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,680L
1,740L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
73L
55L
CO2 emissions
138g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDISkoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDISkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
36.0 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
1,484 kg
3,272 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI7.9 s
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI7.8 s

Although AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI has more power, Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1,404 km
872 mi
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
1,078 km
670 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
7.8 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,943 mm
194.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,531 mm
60.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.9 s
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDISkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
1,484 kg
3,272 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,943 mm
194.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,531 mm
60.3 in
Range score
1,404 km
872 mi
1,078 km
670 mi
CO2 score
138 g/km
-
Trunk score
565 L
20.0 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDISkoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 325 km (202 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Is 326 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 2.0 TDI
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.8 V6 30V
VS
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI vs Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster